Post to Facebook on 18/4/2020 9:44 AM
Commenting on “Why negatively geared landlords are going to struggle the most with reducing rents for tenants”
https://www.domain.com.au/news/why-negatively-geared-landlords-are-going-to-struggle-the-most-with-reducing-rents-for-tenants-948993/
From what I have been tracking, out of all the members reading my blog, less than 20% actually read my blogs in detail, or believe in what I said. The rest probably take my words with a grain of salt, or just being nosy.
At the primary school I volunteer in, the teachers and school children call me a mathematician, but I advise them I am not a mathematician, but I love mathematics.
Since the days I set my eyes on property investment, I rely heavily on mathematics to work out my potential risk of not being able to sleep soundly at night, worrying whether I could repay my loan.
During the early days when credit was freely available, I was asked why I did not borrow to buy properties and shares. I did not follow the norm, because good times never last forever, and if the trend reversed, I could be in deep financial strive. If everyone was to rush in to invest, how could I get the best value for my money?
We need to learn about breakeven and worst case scenario, the latter was discussed in my earlier blog. I do not invest unless I know I can afford to ride out a financial storm, at least for 6 months. Now that I am not in employment, it is more critical to have an watchful eye over my bank balance.
During my online chat, I explained one of my conservative investment strategies - if I had a million dollars to invest in property, and also what I would invest in with a bucket of money.
I am not in agreement with those gurus who have been advising that a successful strategy that an investor adopts in negative gearing should be replicated in the future investment. What these gurus fail to understand and advise accordingly is that the strategy may be conceptually valid, but the financial commitments and dynamics of the investor would have changed after the initial investment.
Circumstances could not be replicated easily by some artificial or mathematical means. In most cases, the mathematics does not stack up that people invest in a business should make a loss in order to get tax benefits.
In my earlier blogs, I talked about a number of property owners would have to let go of their properties after the coronavirus pandemic. Among these will be those involve in negative gearing. I sincerely hope the reason of their selling the properties is not due to their loss of their high income.
Thank you for reading.